Jump to content

Talk:List of river systems by length

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former FLCList of river systems by length is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 20, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
June 26, 2005Featured list candidateNot promoted
February 27, 2007Featured list candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured list candidate

Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2023

[edit]

Please include following rivers in the list of rivers: Ganges river length: 2510 Km Indus River Length: 3180 Km Godavari River Length: 1465 Km Satluj River Length: 1450 Km Yamuna River Length: 1376 Km Krishna River Length: 1400 Km Kaveri River Length: 805 Km SunderSingh22 (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 14:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ganges river Indus river Godavari river Satluj river Yamuna river Krishna river reliable sources 2400:ADC1:493:9D00:284E:E11F:3D13:8AA3 (talk) 13:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discharge

[edit]

Water yield data are outdated and inaccurate. You may want to check with the "List of rivers by discharge" page. 2A02:AB88:4702:7900:E814:7E1D:E460:AFD (talk) 10:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Senegal has wrong continental color-code

[edit]

The Senegal rivers location is color-coded as North American. Needs to be Africa. 77.181.78.72 (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong length for Amazon River (or wrong citation number)

[edit]

In the main table, one can read that the Amazon is 6,992 km long according to source [9] (Liu, Shaochuang; Lu, P; Liu, D; Jin, P; Wang, W (2009-03-01). "Pinpointing the sources and measuring the lengths of the principal rivers of the world"). However, that article claims that the river is 6,575 km long, not 6,992. So either the value 6,992 km comes from another source than [9], in which case the source number should be changed, or the value should be changed to 6,575 km, to match source number [9]. Azam-gicegs (talk) 13:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong length! I have changed it to 6,575 km to match the source cited.
6,992 km is the questionable number reported by an unpublished 2007 study, as pointed out by Britannica. Zywk (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]